This is a bilateral trade agreement between Ontario and Quebec that is consistent with the CFTA. The thresholds for open tenders under the OQTCA for goods, services and construction are the same as those set out in the broader Directive on Public Procurement and University Procurement Policies, including Construction. This threshold is set at $100,000. This rule amends the FAR to slightly revise the thresholds for the application of the WTO GPA and free trade agreements. The revisions shall not add any new burdens and, with the exception of changes to the thresholds themselves, shall not affect the applicability of clauses and provisions equal to or less than the simplified acquisition threshold or to commercial items. This international trade agreement, which was concluded on 21 September. It entered into force in September 2017 and expands opportunities for EU and Canadian suppliers to bid on public procurement. The rules only apply in certain circumstances, namely: if the main contract meets or exceeds these dollar thresholds, Canadian companies are allowed to compete on an equal footing with U.S. companies, unless there is an exception (p.B.

set aside for small businesses). Note: These values are adjusted for inflation every 2 years. The revised thresholds are published by the federal government. Subject: Updating the thresholds for free trade agreements The thresholds applicable from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2023 for government procurement subject to free trade agreements to which the federal government is a party are set out below. Below is a table that lists the dollar thresholds to which each of the trade agreements applies. This table examines the province, including ministries, Crown corporations and the MASH sector, which includes municipalities, academic institutions, social services and health care facilities. Other entities in the broad public sector may have different thresholds. The list of general exceptions to a trade agreement is usually found in the article on security and general exceptions in the chapter on government procurement; However, some trade agreements, such as the CPTPP, also contain exceptions in a special “Exceptions” chapter. Examples can be found at: For any substantive questions regarding government procurement obligations in any of the international trade agreements, please contact Global Affairs Canada: Canada`s free trade agreements do not constitute a barrier to the inclusion of Indigenous peoples and/or corporate policies in government procurement. These include procurement obligations under modern contracts (comprehensive land claims agreements). For more information on Comprehensive Land Claim Agreements (CLAs), see 9.35 Modern Treaties. For more information on the Procurement Strategy for Aboriginal Business (ABP), see 9.40 Procurement Strategy for Aboriginal Business.

Two international free trade agreements help Canadians compete in U.S. federal procurement contracts: Planned procurement notices, also known as tender notices, must be published for contracts subject to free trade agreements. Departments, agencies and certain Crown corporations must publish Buyandsell.gc.ca through Public Services and Procurement Canada`s Government Electronic Tendering Service (GETS) on the tender page of the website. *Please note that the text of the CETA Agreement is presented here for information purposes. The text presented in this document reflects the state of play of the negotiations between Canada and the EU. It is subject to legal review, a process that also includes formatting. Once reviewed and finalized by law, the full text will become binding at the end of the ratification process by Canada and the EU. second, procurement falls under the trade agreement and the obligations under the trade agreement apply. NAFTA stipulates that product offers from signatory countries are treated without discriminatory provisions, with a few exceptions.

In other words, an offer from a Canadian company would receive the same consideration in exchange for an offer from a U.S. company. There are a number of exceptions to this equal treatment. For example, Subpart 25.4 of Far identifies contracts for services that are not covered by NAFTA and other trade agreements. In addition, markets that have been “set aside” for U.S. small businesses and certain other markets that support national security or defence are exempt from NAFTA coverage. The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) is a legally binding agreement that allows companies to compete on an equal footing in foreign government procurement. Although not all WTO Members are bound by this agreement, signatories to the WTO GPA are required to allow open access to domestic government procurement at the federal level if the contracts exceed the dollar value thresholds. Coverage of services varies from one international trade agreement to another. It is important to note that in some ITAs, such as the WTO LDC, the general rule is that only explicitly listed services are covered, while in other IIAs, such as the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement, the general rule is that all services are covered, with the exception of explicitly listed services. For examples, see: Canada is working on a number of fronts to improve and secure access to government procurement for Canadian suppliers.

There are already several agreements that benefit Canadian suppliers. These include: The FAR sets dollar thresholds for the application of NAFTA provisions. The current thresholds are as follows: This final rule implements the new thresholds in far subsection 25.4, Trade Agreements and other sections of the FAR that contain thresholds for trade agreements (i.e., 22.1503, 25.202, 25.603, 25.1101 and 25.1102). All four criteria must be met for procurement to be subject to the applicable trade agreement. These steps are described in more detail in Section 1.25.3 Determining Coverage Under a Trade Agreement. Canada and the United States are both signatories to the WTO GPA, which provides Canadian companies with free trade protection for their participation in U.S. federal procurement contracts, similar to NAFTA. In addition, the WTO GPA allows Canadians to compete on an equal footing at the sub-federal level in certain circumstances. In February 2010, Canada and the United States agreed to open access to sub-federal government procurement under WTO GPA rules.

In the United States, 37 countries are signatories to the WTO GPA as “sub-central (federal) government entities.” In these countries, Canadians now enjoy free trade protection under WTO and GPA guidelines if the principal value of the contract exceeds the applicable thresholds and no other declared exceptions apply. Where set-aside or an exemption is used or used, some or all aspects of procurement may not be subject to certain obligations under trade agreements. In such cases, in order to reduce the risk, contract agents should continue to comply as far as possible with the obligations arising from trade agreements and should deviate only where necessary to serve the objective(s) for which the derogation is used or set-aside is applied. .